My daughter posted this video on Facebook. It is series of AT&T ads from 1993 that were on a CD-Rom that the company paid Newsweek to include as advertising in an issue, to drive home the idea that some day all publication would happen via CD-Rom.
The interesting thing is almost all of this stuff happens now, but the actual engineering is a little different. The ad predicts EZPass (but without the tranponder but using a in-car card reader instead), video conferences (although the graphics and windows management still has not caught up with the projection), smart and remote classrooms, on-demand video, etc.
As far as I can see, they appear to have only missed two developments that at once made the predictions possible but changed the way they happen: they missed was the advent of cell phones and the subsequent development of smart phones. They also missed the idea of digital radio-transmission, which made the cell phone and a whole host of other things possible. I know enough about the latter to tile the dance floor on the head of a pin, but digitizing data transmitted by radio means that much more information can be crammed into a radio frequency. This explains why your car remote doesn't open your garage door and why you garage remote doesn't screw up some kid's remote control airplane, all of which pretty much share the same radio frequencies. And why it is that so many cell-phones can work off the same towers all at once.
There is a third thing the ads missed, and that is the economic constraints that direct how technologies are used (that have nothing to do with the technologies themselves).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eba89/eba89685de458c9ae44c7edd0191159d2c9bd9f6" alt=""
So technology can't by itself fix everything because it is subject to other human endeavors like economics, politics and the only real universal constant: bureaucracy.
One thing they got right is that AT&T is at the heart of it all, although they are now owned by a then-new "baby Bell." They handle a major portion of the world's internet traffic through what they used to call "Long Lines" built when plain-old-telephone-service ruled.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72360/72360452381e2b3b790bf171ea9b7feb67b188a2" alt=""
3 comments:
I wish I could like AT&T more than I do. Around here they are almost nonexistent and what is here doesn't work very well. I wish Apple would allow another carrier.
I understand. This was not meant as a peon to AT&T as a whole, which would be silly since what is called AT&T is not the same company that existed in 1993...which was different that what was AT&T in 1968. Instead, I was thinking about comparing how the vision for technology and the reality line up and how this has affected how we interact.
The company that handles internet traffic pretty well, their core business, is not so hot on other things.
I understand. I was just irritated because I wanted to make a long distance call on my cell but had no signal. That has become the norm here. Where would we be without Bell Labs tho? And they really did a good job of predicting given the times.
Post a Comment